Comments 0

Today is Good Friday, the day Jesus was condemned to be crucified that is recognized in Christian tradition. What most people don’t know is today is also “give us Barabbas day”, that coincides with Pilates release of Barabbas who was chosen over Jesus to be released.
Scan the headlines to find out who was released. It works every time. I have been doing this now for about 8 years. Its almost like a twilight zone episode. Sometimes their obscure but you can still find them. Sometimes its a day during Holy Week, so its really “Give us Barabbas week”, but why split hairs.
Its a day or week when the innocent are condemned and guilty are freed.

Todays headline 4-2-21

“Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker granted a sentence commutation Thursday to a 57-year-old inmate who has served nearly three decades behind bars following his conviction in a 1990 Chicago double murder case.
The Democrat governor’s move came after a Cook County judge ruled last year that Gerald Reed should remain in prison because his rights were never violated, as he had claimed, according to The Associated Press.”


Comments 1

I enjoy reading the rantings of others. Sometimes your reading something and its way outside the realm of mainstream thought, bordering on “crazy talk”, but that person will say something no longer than a sentence or maybe a few selected words that is absolutely brilliant. I read a great deal with most of my news coming from reading rather than television because I have come to believe that television
is nothing short of propaganda and psyops. I am convinced that mainstream thought is a serious problem. You wonder how people can follow the ideology or political beliefs of an opposing side, but its not that hard to understand. You won’t change a single individual’s thinking. We have 2 opposing sides in the political/social realm of things. Each one thinks the other is brainwashed. We believe that anything outside mainstream thought, the most common train of thought is the safest place to be so that we are not victims of being brainwashed. For example, if CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC and all the news services are saying the same thing, virtually a mirror image of thought of each other, then our brains tell us that’s the side to be on. It’s a herd mentality. You will never change their mind, they will have to change their own by some revelation that they come to learn.

When an individual says something outside of the mainstream of thought they are immediately rejected by the masses. The whole does not gravitate or swarm towards that lone voice, it moves one by one and slowly away from that mainstream thought, usually caused by a recommendation from one to another.
People on one side of an ideology cannot believe that people on the other side are so gullible and allow themselves to be brainwashed and it usually starts with mainstream thinkers.
The belief that if the majority of mainstream thought is one thing then there is no way that it is propaganda, a lie or brainwashing. The mainstream media even pushes this narrative to reinforce it.
It further marginalizes a group of thinkers that are actually among the minority.

There are many Christians who embrace this majority thought but fail to recognize that Jesus himself was a sole person who rejected mainstream teachings of the time. He rejected what the religious leaders of the time were teaching and the masses sided with the religious leaders and their mainstream thought equivalency. Still people see safety in following the crowd even if they disagree with what the crowd is saying because they feel its better than the alternative. Liberals have been demonizing conservatism for as far back as I can remember, as far back as 40 years. Conservatism has been labeled racists, bigots, homophobes, Nazi’s and every name under the sun, by the liberal media streams just mentioned, all doing it in perfect unison.
People are reluctant to abandon the liberal ideology to become part of group that carries those labels so they join in on the condemnation, simply mimicking what they hear from the liberal ideologues.

Rush Limbaugh used to say, “being a liberal is the easiest thing in the world, all you have to do is say yes to everything”.
As for me, I always like to read up on the things that are outside of mainstream thought because they often reveal truths even when they are small ones.


Comments 0

The left is advocating for “more thorough” background checks even though gun purchases require those already. The list of mass shooters who passed background checks are lengthy, causing many to ponder its value. The left knows this, so what is it their really after? The answer is hidden in the seemingly innocent phrase “more thorough background checks”. A “more thorough background check” will be fruitless with existing background information available. A “more thorough” check will require MORE data. Look at the mass shootings made by those who passed their background checks to purchase a firearm. Obviously, there was information missing that could have prevented the shootings. so how do you fix this missing information gap, when living in this “information age”?

This push for more thorough background checks is really an effort to fill in the missing pieces needed in order to create a more accurate “risk/threat assessment” from your future “citizen dossier”.
When we hear “more thorough background checks” related to gun control we automatically gravitate to the gun control debate.
We should instead gravitate towards arguing against becoming a surveillance state. Its the precursor to gun control. The collection of data has already begun. There aren’t too many pieces remaining.

Communist countries have been maintaining dossiers and keeping tabs on their citizens long before computers were invented. While everyone is focused on gun control a surveillance state is the real goal. Gun Control is really the issue on the back-end not the front.
Make no mistake about it gun control is in the funnel of this surveillance state effort. It is tied to the need to make accurate “risk/threat assessments”, so the gun control will come later. Look at the “cancel culture”, attacks on free speech, laws developing against “hate speech”, all of this is in that funnel of creating a surveillance state. Once laws are created you cannot control that which gets re-defined or added. They do it all the time.

Many people might say, “so what, I have nothing to hide”. You may be right as long as you don’t voice your opinion, complain about the price of anything, never question government decisions publicly or to your neighbor, don’t participate in social media, don’t use the internet or ever write a letter to the editor then you’re probably going to be in full compliance in the future. If you don’t buy and read books that run counter to a particular ideology, subscribe to certain magazines, or only make purchases with cash then you won’t have much on your citizen dossier, and you won’t have anything to hide. However, you will find yourself in a place of surrender, doing only what the government wants you to do.

Another favorite word used by government and media sources, that you must watch for, is the word “loopholes” used to describe gaps or missing pieces. You hear about “loopholes” for example related to transfers of firearms and gun shows. An effort to have “more thorough background checks” is an effort to close these loopholes. Think about your citizen dossier with a threat/risk assessment score tied to it much like a credit score. Think about a risk assessment calculated based on your speech, behaviors, medical prescriptions, subscriptions and all your purchases.

Still you say, “so what”!
The next thing to think about is who will have access to this information, like insurance companies, employers or any company that has to send someone to your house for service. Lets say you are listed as “high risk” because you own a gun, have bought books that are considered anti-government, and you got into a heated argument with your neighbor over some subject AND your medical records show you were treated for depression and you were prescribed anti-depressants. Next thing you know there is a digital red flag on your name and your address. You will become marginalized, unable to work, unable to afford insurance that will be legally required to carry and towards the end of your misery, you will willingly give up your firearm to improve your risk score from your citizen dossier. Much of this data will be data mined using “bots” which we will cover in another future blog.

Your citizen dossier could fill with examples of what is deemed as anti-government rants on social media giving your dossier a red flag. That would be valuable information to insurance companies and employers. Insurance companies could go up on your rates because you’re a high risk individual and Employers would know to stay away from you. Your neighbor or even a family member at the first sign of trouble or disagreement will help provide information for your citizen dossier.
These people routinely rat each other out in communist countries. There is plenty of information out there that suggests a move towards more of a communist state whether you want to label it a conspiracy theory or not. Its been predicted by many for decades and even communist supporters themselves that the US will one day become governed by communist principles.

Once you have the basics of “citizen dossiers”, built by “more thorough background checks”, anti-communism activity will more easily identified and dealt with by the state, much like what was done in Russia, Cuba, China and other communist countries.
Don’t expect it will be communism first then citizen dossiers second. It will be the other way around.

We are given examples by the gun control crowd of countries with gun control laws that work but one country they never mention is Mexico with its tough gun control laws and take a look at it. In Mexico there is only 1 gun store in the whole country. “If they take away our guns then only the cartels will have guns”! More thorough background checks is a means to that end but gun control is not the only end. Your voice will also be disarmed.
This innocent phrase “more thorough background checks” is a Trojan horse and sinister.


Comments 0

They say that “they eyes are a window to the soul”.
When I read headlines I am drawn to the eyes after I started noticing things. What I look for is that “nothingness”. I look for those dead eyes. They have a certain stare to them. You notice something is off, maybe the spacing, or the corners are often down turned or upturned in an unusual way. They are often darker than a regular brown eyed person, but its not always the color that is odd. Rarely are they blue or green or even regular brown. There is a certain emptiness. Sometimes they bulge or the whites are larger than the rest of the eye. They are sometimes out of balance or not proportional to the head, with a sleepy look or more wide open than normal exposing the whites more. Its an unscientific hobby of course and it belongs in the unpopular profiling category, but its an interesting thing to watch for. After a while you start to see the same thing! Maybe there is some truth to the old saying “the eyes are a window to the soul”, but what about those that might not have one?

Here’s a few examples to help you practice, with a couple of non-murderous types thrown in for comparison.
Take your time studying them. It will serve you well in the future.

Boulder Colorado shooter – Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa

Jeffrey Dahmer
Needs no introduction

Charles Manson
Needs no introduction

Margaret Sanger
Abortion advocate – Planned Parenthood founder

Reverend Jim Jones
Jonestown Massacre

The Menendez Brothers
Murdered their parents

David Koresh
Branch Davidians

Lee Harvey Oswald
JFK Assasin

Jack Ruby – Oswald Assassin

Ted Kazinsky – The Unabomber

Phile Spector – Record Producer and Murderer

Jared Fogle Subway Perv

Just a journalist named Kurt Eichanwald who said “I want to find an antimasker and beat them to death; You Fucking Christians are what Jesus condemns.”
Not in any way connected to any of these but he has the same eyes.

Marc Elias – The lawyer who was the architect of vote by mail. Not in any way connected to the monsters on this page but he has those lifeless eyes.

Eric Rudolph – Atlanta bomber

David Berkowitz – Son of Sam

Can you guess this one?

Jeffrey Toobin – Zoom call wanker fame

Jeffrey Epstein


Comments 0

Remember when the owners of brands like Aunt Jemima, Uncle Ben, and the Indian on Land of Lakes and a growing list of other brands that are removing the so called racist imagery from their products? Don’t think for a minute there was some outside source pressuring them to do this. The movement that started the ball rolling was an inside job.
The narrative we hear is the one they want us to hear but there is another side and that is the one that is founded in “racism”.
It is one of the most clever campaigns of convincing the public they are becoming woke and more sensitive to racism when in fact their decisions are rooted in racism. They are removing icons of various non-white ethnicities from products.

Do you think the white supremacist groups are out there complaining about the changes or celebrating? I bet they are celebrating a great achievement of finally removing from the national conscience the imagery, the names and the historical significance of ethnic groups. The Washington Redskins have changed, and the Cleveland Indians are under fire and it seems like the list is never ending, all under the guise of the greater good. But when you think about it in reverse or an alternate view other than the story your being told, you begin to see something that looks more like a modified version of ethnic cleansing from the American conscience. The white supremacists must be loving it, or maybe its the white supremacist masquerading as someone else that are responsible for it.